New 'Wild Lands' Policy Blasted At Congressional Hearing
The U.S. Interior Department's new "Wild Lands" land-use policy was
sharply criticized during a congressional hearing on March 1, the
American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) reports. The policy could
close millions of acres of federal land to responsible motorized
recreation.
Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter argued that, with the new policy, the
Interior Department "has circumvented the sovereignty of states and
the will of the public." Utah Gov. Gary Herbert said that "by
bureaucratic fiat, one branch of government has overstepped and
overreached and has devalued the rights of the states and the
citizens." And Dennis Smith, a commissioner in Jackson County,
Ore., said the Wild Lands policy "should be reversed in its
entirety."
They joined several others in testifying before the House Committee
on Natural Resources on "The Impact of the Administration's Wild
Lands Order on Jobs and Economic Growth."
Robert Abbey, director of the federal Bureau of Land Management
(BLM), defended the Wild Lands policy, testifying that it "restores
balance to the BLM's multiple-use management of the public lands in
accordance with applicable law."
Courts have ruled that the BLM inventory of public land must
include "inventory of wilderness values and that BLM must consider
those values in its land-use planning," Abbey said.
On Dec. 22, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar signed Secretarial Order
3310 creating the Wild Lands land-use designation that essentially
allows BLM officials to manage public land as if it had received a
Wilderness designation from Congress, but without requiring
congressional approval. This new policy is widely expected to
restrict or eliminate responsible off-highway vehicle (OHV) use in
the affected areas.
A Wilderness designation is one of the strictest forms of public
land management. Once Congress designates an area as Wilderness,
nearly all forms of non-pedestrian recreation are illegal. The AMA
supports appropriate Wilderness designations that meet the criteria
established by Congress in 1964, but anti-access advocates have
been abusing the legislative process to ban responsible OHV
recreation on public land.
Otter testified that the new Wild Lands policy places a higher
priority on protection of "wilderness characteristics" than on
multiple uses of land. The drastic change in public policy for
public land "was done without public input," he said.
"Tourism and motorized recreation are important industries in
Idaho," Otter testified. "Cross country, off-highway vehicle travel
is not allowed in WSAs [Wilderness Study Areas] and, most
assuredly, will not be allowed in Wild Lands. Due to repeated
closures of roads and trails on federal lands, experience tells us
that existing trails will be closed and no new trails for OHV
travel will be authorized in LWCs [lands with wilderness
characteristics] and areas designated 'Wild Lands.'
"The impact to motorized recreation in southern Idaho will be
dramatic and, in turn, will impact Idaho's economy," he said.
Herbert noted that Secretarial Order 3310 "has undone years of
collaborative and costly work between county officials,
environmental organizations, natural resource industries, citizens
and our local Bureau of Land Management offices as they have worked
together to craft BLM resource management plans."
He added: "This action usurps the authority of Congress, and for
the first time ever, creates a favored category [wilderness
characteristics] for multiple-use management, creates new levels of
centralized bureaucratic review, contains vague, inconsistent and
overly broad definitions of Wild Lands, and lacks clarity as to
what is wilderness and what is subject to multiple use and
development."
Smith noted that his county and surrounding counties in Oregon have
unemployment rates of 15 percent to 20 percent, and the Wild Lands
policy could be devastating for those counties.
"Secretarial Order 3310 promises to make an intolerable situation
even worse by locking up even more BLM land, creating de facto
Wilderness areas without congressional action or oversight, and
without the support of local communities that will be adversely
impacted," he said.
Following the hearing, Ed Moreland, AMA senior vice president for
government relations, urged all concerned riders to contact their
federal lawmakers and ask them to oppose the Wild Lands policy
because it usurps congressional authority over public land-use
designations.
To contact your federal lawmakers to oppose the Wild Lands policy,
go to
http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/rights/issueslegislation.
"With the new Wild Lands policy, anti-access advocates and the
administration are now seeking an end-run around Congress that
could have far-reaching negative implications for the 245 million
acres of public land managed by the BLM," Moreland said.